Firm News

ABC Florida First Coast speaks to Florida Legislators
Michael Cox recently volunteered to join ABC Florida First Coast to meet with state legislators to discuss key issues and proposed legislation impacting the construction industry. Our contribution focused on proposed legislation addressing contractor liens and other key issues that impact our clients daily. We make it a priority to support our clients wherever we […]
Favorable Verdict in Polk County, Florida – copy
John Kessenich and Nicholas Bussé recently obtained a favorable verdict for clients in an auto injury matter in Polk County, Florida. The Plaintiff had extensive treatment, including radiofrequency ablation, and was recommended to undergo a cervical fusion. The Defense admitted liability and strategically focused on the Plaintiff’s various health conditions as the actual cause of […]
Favorable Verdict in Osceola County, Florida
Andrew Leggette and Shaw M. Ashley recently obtained a favorable verdict for a small business client in a bodily injury matter in Osceola County, Florida. The trial was difficult as the Plaintiff underwent a lumbar fusion and otherwise had no prior treatment history. Despite this, the Defense admitted liability and anchored their trial strategy focusing […]
Supporting Insureds through the Pre-Suit Process
For those of us unaccustomed to dealing with the law on a daily basis, getting an unexpected legal document can be extremely stressful. This is why, here at Taylor Day, we work extremely hard to make sure our insureds understand the process they are going through. The insureds are given every opportunity to comply with […]
Analyzing Driver Qualification for Commercial Motor Vehicle Claims
Understanding what qualifies and disqualifies a driver of a commercial motor vehicle is a critical tool for defending against negligent hiring claims directed towards a motor carrier. The same understanding can and should also be utilized by motor carrier employers when making hiring decisions. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) establishes rigorous qualification standards […]
Navigating the Defense of Stacking and Non-Stacking Insurance Policies in Florida
Understanding how stacking and non-stacking insurance policies operate is critical for defending Florida’s uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage claims. Stacking allows an insured to combine coverage limits from multiple vehicles or policies, thereby increasing the total available payout for uninsured/underinsured motorist claims. This coverage provides policyholders with broader coverage but also creates complexities in litigation, particularly when […]
Taylor Day Law Welcomes Five New Attorneys to Staff
LINDSAY A. MICHAEL received her B.A. in Criminology and Minor in Business Administration from the University of Florida. She earned her Juris Doctorate from Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad Law Center. Lindsay worked for the State Attorney’s Office and the Florida Department of Highway Safety before joining Taylor, Day, Grimm & Boyd. Her practice focuses […]
Andrew Leggette Promoted to Partner
Taylor, Day, Grimm & Boyd expanded their leadership team, promoting Andrew Leggette to Partner in January. Andrew has extensive experience representing automobile insurance companies and their insureds against insurance claims. As a Partner, Andrew will continue to assist clients in Auto Insurance Defense, focusing his practice on Personal Injury Protection Benefits. Andrew received his Juris […]
The Give and Get of Discovery
During litigation, a party generally engages in discovery.  In fact, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 provides, “[p]arties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property for inspection and […]
The Gatekeeper Rule: Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.202
In Florida, most practitioners have experienced a local rule or administrative order requiring the parties to “meet and confer” on any non-dispositive motion prior to scheduling a hearing. The local “meet and confer” requirement was a gatekeeper to the court, and perhaps more importantly, an obstacle to moving a case forward. In an effort “[t]o […]